When I check the app "P004 Analog Watch Face" on the Google Play Store, the most striking thing is its rating: a flat 0 out of 5 stars. This immediately raises concerns and warrants a closer look at what the app offers, and potentially why users have given it such a low score.
The app, developed by PRADO DESIGN, falls under the "Personalization" category and aims to provide an analog watch face for Wear OS devices. Its primary function is to display the time in a classic analog format, while also integrating several useful complications, or additional pieces of information displayed on the watch face.
The listed key features include: analog time display, a step counter (displayed as a percentage), weekday and date information, heart rate monitoring, battery level indication, moon phase, customization options, different style choices, an always-on display mode, and shortcuts to various functions. The customization options seem to be a major selling point, promising users the ability to tailor the watch face to their individual preferences. The inclusion of an always-on display is also a welcome feature, allowing users to quickly glance at the time without needing to fully activate the watch screen.
This watch face would be particularly useful for individuals who prefer the traditional look of an analog watch but also want the convenience of smart features. It caters to users who are interested in tracking their activity levels (steps, heart rate), monitoring battery life, and staying informed about the date and time. The customization options make it appealing to those who want a personalized experience and a watch face that matches their style.
However, the 0-star rating cannot be ignored. This strongly suggests potential issues with the app's functionality, stability, or user experience. It's possible that the app suffers from bugs, crashes frequently, drains battery excessively, or fails to accurately display the promised information. The description mentions the need to enable permissions, which could be a source of frustration for some users if not clearly explained or implemented. Furthermore, the disclaimer that "some features may not be available on different watches and phones" raises concerns about compatibility and could lead to disappointment if advertised features are not accessible.
Without actually using the app, it's difficult to pinpoint the exact reasons for the negative rating. However, the combination of a promising feature set and a dismal user rating paints a picture of an app with potential that is currently unrealized. Potential users should proceed with caution and carefully consider the risks before installing this watch face. It would be wise to look for alternative analog watch faces with better ratings and reviews until the developer addresses the issues that are contributing to the low score.
Review published on November 1, 2025